For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Exactly Protocol (EXA)

EXA Smart Contract Address (OP Mainnet):

0x1e925de1c68ef83bd98ee3e130ef14a50309c01b EXA Smart Contract Address (Base):

0x1e925de1c68ef83bd98ee3e130ef14a50309c01b

The EXA token grants holders the right to vote on system changes and upgrades. Holders of the EXA token will wield power over the Protocol’s treasury and smart contract upgrades.

As the Protocol develops, EXA token holders will play a crucial role in decision-making, including setting collateral requirements, introducing new collateral types, adjusting borrowing and lending terms, and managing token incentives. These decisions demand thoughtful evaluation of various factors, and the Exactly team will provide research, analysis, and open-source simulations to assist the community in making informed decisions.

Timelock

Circulating Supply & Token Holders

nonCirculatingSupply => sum of the EXA balance of: Sablier_V2_Lockup_Dynamic SablierV2LockupLinear TimelockController RewardsController EscrowedEXA Treasury Airdrop

totalWithdrawable => the sum of the amount withdrawable from each Sablier stream

EXA Token Unlock Schedule

Dune Dashboards

Price Info

Velodrome DEX

EXA/WETH Vaults

Get EXA

EXA on Base

Following the approval of EXAIP-30, the EXA token is now natively deployed on Base at the same address as on OP Mainnet (0x1e925de1c68ef83bd98ee3e130ef14a50309c01b), ensuring a consistent cross-chain identity. This deployment builds on EXAIP-26, which established the foundation for EXA's cross-chain expansion, and enables broader distribution through partners within the Base ecosystem. EXA maintains a single global supply across all chains: there is no local minting, and all minting and burning is exclusively controlled by authorized bridges through a bridge-gated mint/burn mechanism compliant with the EIP-7802 cross-chain standard. Cross-chain transfers between OP Mainnet and Base are enabled via a Hyperlane bridge, which preserves supply integrity at the contract level.

Last updated

Was this helpful?